
Three months ago Oliver Stone's South of the Border movie premiered and the purpose of it was to portray Chavez and other South American leaders in a different light than how they are seen in the Western media. Has Stone been correct in his judgment and objectivity? Some critics have compared this documentary to Michael Moore's Capitalism: A Love Story.
Read this article in TIME: South of the Border': Hugo Chavez and Stone's Love Story
Perhaps this documentary does show Chavez in a different light and highlights what he meant and accomplished for Venezuela, but nevertheless this documentary should still be viewed with a critical eye as Oliver Stone's points out: "If he succeeds it will be the first time in Latin American history where he has led an entire region away from the United States economic control." We should listen carefully to his words...If, if he succeeds...but at what cost?
Watch the trailer of "South of the Border"
